Friday, November 25, 2011

Burning point of bank statements and other curiousities


Concepts like distribution the early portions of section 2 I find difficult to illustrate with the same ease as the sections detailing, for example, informal fallacies as their subject. The visual element I find helpful though, where complex ideas or qualities don’t have to be understood solely from the choice of wording but additionally through the spacing and placement of shapes. Every little bit helps.

For this week I would still like to continue the valuable practice of relating “real life” examples or interactions to our discipline but will make a move toward more general philosophical problems that we nonetheless encounter in our attempts to quantify and understand our world logically.
Last night I was helping someone rebuild a fire in their fireplace. In a commendable use of social excesses she often uses junk mail to accelerate this process, so that, ideally, after strategically lining the warm coals with coupons, Victoria’s Secret catalogue pages, and bank statements, there is (if all goes well) a satisfying “pop” where most of the paper will simultaneously ignite and start the logs smoldering…

This struck me as an instance of changes in degree creating changes in quality. And that’s not even a bad joke. Maybe a fun question to muse upon this week would be: What are the implications that changes in degree can create such drastic changes in quality? Does this speak anything to the meaning of a quality, how entrenched these may or may not be, and to what extend (in that there are more flexible or conditional than we like to commonly think) do differing qualities truly distinguish us this being the case?

Food for thought to wash down some of that polite banter you are hopefully employing when discussing civil issues with your conservative-leaning uncle who made had too many Coors lights.

Gob gob.    

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

"people doing things to each other with chainsaws during tuperware parties..."

just to finish you off:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qBArMmngVH4

Burt Bacharach writes my material

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkp7f8IxJNU

Being as we all had a blast applying Hurley to Thank You For Smoking here is a link to a scene from Monty Python's The Meaning of Life. I put it up for what I saw as a fallacy of the composition on part of the couple regarding the amazingly unaccountable presence of the letter S in important thinkers. Plus its funny as hell. And its always great watching other cultures portraying characters conspicuously "American”.

Laughter is sometimes the only relief from the perplexity and pain of human existence and DEFINATLY the best relief from underwhelming mid-term performances. Enjoy.

Friday, November 4, 2011

Hurley in history


Robert Connors

History repeats itself

T
hese nascent Wall Street occupying demonstrations go way beyond “howling in the wind” and will develop into a useful amalgamation of its many ethnic, religious, cultural, economic, and environmental components.

We, the 99 percent, have our own individual stories to tell and at a minimum, intuitively know that something is wrong with U.S. society mostly due to its seemingly unfettered capitalistic excesses. Unbridled greed is ripping the fabric of our society apart at an accelerated pace. Take a look at Michael Moore’s recent interviews on “Democracy Now” for further insight and discussion, for example.

A look at U.S., albeit local, history can reveal interesting comparisons to our present plight.

For example, in the late 1700s, farmers in Western Massachusetts were mostly uneducated, isolated and much-maligned and eventually rebelled against “the system” in what is called Shays Rebellion. They revolted
against economic and legal unfairness in what has been called the second Revolutionary War. It’s worth researching the remarkable similarities between this post-Revolutionary War Shay’s Rebellion and today’s economic inequities. Many of these simple farmers were Revolutionary War soldiers who were previously told that they were fighting for economic and social justice. Then after the war, many discovered that they couldn’t pay their farm mortgages because they were never paid for their war efforts and some maintained that they were lied to about their farm mortgage payback terms.

However, the farmer’s active rebellion against the plutocracy of the Bostonbased elitist bankers, merchants and lawyers, was
defeated by a moneyed militia. (The last significant battle was fought in Sheffield.) The well-heeled 1-percenters were quite afraid of what the masses could do to them and somewhat reluctantly agreed to write the U. S. Constitution into law as a result.

Be inspired by what these farmers ultimately achieved when you tell the plutocracy that you too are “mad as hell and won’t take it anymore.” In addition, think about whether present- day U. S. capitalism, featuring a Wall Street government, is approaching its natural earthly limits. The Western Massachusetts farmers of old were enraged then and the 99 percenters need to be awakened now to what is occurring in front of their own eyes.


Robert Connors lives in Canaan, N.Y.


It’s worth researching the remarkable similarities between post-Revolutionary War Shay’s Rebellion and today’s economic inequities.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The exercises in Chapter 3.5 are mostly a collection of real-life excerpts that take us beyond Hurley’s well written examples and into a field where the fallacies are not as readily apparent or necessarily so singular. The piece above is an op-ed from the 10/16/11 Berkshire Eagle. Is the analogy between the 18th century and today historically accurate, appropriate, and a strong one? Hurley spends much time discussing how our worldview and specifically our emotions influence our phrasing. What are our thoughts on the tone of his language? Is there a threshold or quality to emotive language where it then becomes manipulative? Of course, it would take all the fun out of writing if we had to always and automatically write in standard argument form… but worth considering. Also – are there appeals to people or force here? I feel blemishes of it but am unsure. Have a good weekend all!